10/17/08

Joe the Plumber and Spreading the Wealth...

Let me open with a verse from Acts 2:42-47

They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and to the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer. Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need. Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts,praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.

I confess i didn't watch the debate, but instead i watched the follow up news coverage and found myself intrigued by Joe the Plumber. I found some interesting news stories on the guy and watched a clip of the exchange between him and Barak.

I'm not going to argue about who's system is good or taxes being raised. That's a dead horse in my opinion cuz both sides think they're right and can predict the future. Instead im interested in the christian/biblical response to the notion of spreading the wealth around.

Lately i've discovered i can read boring books online and have decided to delve back into re-reading the works of Walter Rauschenbusch. For those of you who dont know, he is the father of the Social Gospel movement and greatly influenced MLK and a few others. Very important theologian of whom you've probably never heard of. But in his book "Christianizing the Social Order" he points out that capitalism is neither good or bad/moral or immoral. Instead its the values that we are taught by the church and school that form the morals that are applied to our business and economic systems. There is a tug of war between the two and they are constantly influencing one another.

Back to Joe, who may not be a plumber... One thing Barak said is that he thinks we should "spread the wealth around" Which brings me to the verse above. Several times in the New Testament we are told that the people in the early church lived in sharing communities. In fact two people were killed for lying and not sharing all the had with the community. (bonus points for verse and names of those people!) The "plumber" replied that being taxed at a higher percentage for making more would be a disincentive for him to pursue wealth. Which of course the republicans jumped on and used ad nauseum in their campaign ad and apparently in the debate.

However in re-reading Rauschenbusch and going through Acts again. I found myself asking some hard questions about Christians, wealth and politics. Questions such as; Should Christians be affiliated with a particular party? (little known/forgotten fact was that in the early 20th century the majority of Christians were democrats, it wasn't until the fall out from the modernist/fundamentalist controversies and the manipulation of the abortion issue that Christians moved to the Republican party). Should Christians be pursuing wealth? If we are people of the book, how come many churches don't encourage/practice the kind of sharing we see in the New Testament?

If anything this election is a call for us to re-examine christian community and our interaction with our political/economic system. Im not arguing for moving socialist, tho i do have moments.(especially considering the blatant corruption in the markets and medical insurance systems...) As a friend pointed out, in the early church that kind of sharing was voluntary. But it does set an example for what should be happening in our churches.

Thoughts?

3 comments:

preacherman said...

I don't know about "Joe the Pumber" (didn't watch the debates and haven't really kept up with what they are saying about the guy) but I do know Jesus Christ and what he desires for His church.

I think God paints a beautiful picture of the church in Acts:2:42-ff. Christians acting as not a "community" so to say but a "family" meeting and sharing each others needs. Taking care of one another like a family would. As they did this meeting needs and sharing notice what happened..."The Lord added to their number those who were being saved." (Act2:46)

I wonder if churches really did this and practiced these verses if we would have more conversions.

I think it is sad that many Churches and Christians don't meet one anothers needs or they feel afraid to even ask the church for help in fear of being stigmatized or judge by their own.

I hope that is 21st century Christians that we will change the way we see Church. It is my prayer the church function as a family where there is love, peace, forgiveness, healing, grace, and growth.

Wonderful post! You do a fantastic job getting those who visit to think about the text and topics that concern today. It is awesome. I hope you have a great weekend.

Foggy Blogger said...

Hi Preacherman! Thanks for the beautiful post. I taught a whole sunday school on acts last year. Great stuff in there. I agree, we talk about the church being a community. But in the early days it was thought to be more as a family. That has some pretty powerful theological/ecclesiastical implications!

Hmmm....

Tit for Tat said...

The bigger question may be what type of Christian are you? On one hand I see Mother Theresa on the other Joel Olsteen, where do you fit in on that spectrum?